Bio

Dr. Mike Halsey is the chancellor of Grace Biblical Seminary, a Bible teacher at the Hangar Bible Fellowship, the author of Truthspeak and his new book, The Gospel of Grace and Truth: A Theology of Grace from the Gospel of John," both available on Amazon.com. A copy of his book, Microbes in the Bloodstream of the Church, is also available as an E-book on Amazon.com. If you would like to a receive a copy of his weekly Bible studies and other articles of biblical teaching and application, you can do so by writing to Dr. Halsey at michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net and requesting, "The Hangar Bible Fellowship Journal."

Comments may be addressed to michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net.

If you would like to contribute to his ministry according to the principle of II Corinthians 9:7, you may do so by making your check out to Hangar Bible Fellowship and mailing it to 65 Teal Ct., Locust Grove, GA 30248. All donations are tax deductible.

Come visit the Hangar some Sunday at 10 AM at the above address. You'll be glad you did.

Other recommended grace-oriented websites are:

notbyworks.org
literaltruth.org
gracebiblicalseminary.org
duluthbible.org
clarityministries.org

Also:

Biblical Ministries, Inc.
C/O Dr. Richard Grubbs
P. O. Box 64582
Lubbock, TX 79464-4582

Friday, May 29, 2015

DEFINING THE DEVIANT

Something has happened to us and it’s not good. What’s happened is both profound and fundamental. Let’s call it an “inversion,” an inversion so drastic that, like Robert Heinlein wrote, “We’re strangers in a strange land, a land we don’t recognize.”

HAIL TO THE REDSKINS!

Let’s start with something personal that occurred in October 1999. My junior high school, now called a “middle school,” was, in my day, and since its founding in 1948, proud to call its 9th, 8th, and 7th grade teams, “The Redskins,” “The Braves,” and the Papooses.” (As you might surmise, the “Papooses” were the 7th graders and the noble “Redskins” were the 9th graders as each team fought for gridiron basketball glory.) On those teams were one who would become a professional baseball player and one who would almost become a professional football player. (Although I give off an athletic aura, I was neither one.)  

You can guess where this is going: in October 1999, the Redskins ceased to exist and my alma mater’s mascot became “The Knights.” The change was strange because, as the superintendent of schools said, “There were no complaints about the former name.” But they changed the name to engage in, as principal Robert Guerrero admitted,  ''political correctness.'' He went on to say that the new name must be politically correct, so they settled on the “Knights.” This would have made Edgar Allen Poe happy, since he wrote about “Gaily bedight, A Gallant Knight,” in the poem, “El Dorado.” (I’m can recite this poem, and will do so upon request.)

In front of my junior high, stood a stone sign which read, “O. L. Slaton Redskins,” complete with a profile of an Indian’s head in full headdress. The drawing was a noble one and had class. When they changed the name, down came the sign and it’s now in a time capsule somewhere.  The principal noted that there would be some expense incurred in the name change—the dismantling of the sign and the uniforms that they must redo. But that’s what taxpayers are for.

Upon reading of the change, I felt like a stranger in a strange land.

CELEBRATE!

I’ve learned of another change in those hallowed halls of my education. In May, they celebrated Cinco de Mayo[1] with “Ballet Folklorico dancers” performing on stage in the auditorium along with mariachi musicians. Also, two O. L. Slaton teachers, Ana Montalvo and Daisy Ortega, explained the cultural significance of Mexican art at the assembly. I don’t know if Poe would have been pleased, but what are Ballet Folklorico dancers, and why are they in my auditorium? (I know, I know. Alex, the answer is “diversity.” But my question is, “When is there enough diversity?)

Upon reading of the celebration, the Ballet Folklorico dancers, and the explanation of the significance of Mexican art, I felt like a stranger in a strange land.

THE INVERSION

But that’s just a team mascot, one dismantled sign, and a celebration of an event in a foreign country. But the inversion is more serious.

We can’t let our children play unattended in a public park in broad daylight; we can’t let them walk home alone from the park without public censure and risking a citation and a court appearance; we can’t spank them when they misbehave; we can’t say, “Merry Christmas” without thinking about it; in some public circles, when a tragedy befalls, we can’t say, “Our prayers are with you,” we’re to say, “Our thoughts are with you.” In Oakland, California, schools, students may curse at a teacher without expulsion, because they might be hungry or tired from not having slept the night before.  On the college level, one Harvard student said that he was opposed to same sex marriage, but was afraid to say so on campus for fear of reprisals.

Recently a student newspaper reprimanded college a professor for discussing Ovid’s Metamorphoses in class which included the following famous myth:

As she [Persephone the daughter of Zeus, ] reached down to pluck  a flower from its resting place, her feet began to tremble and the earth was split in two. Life for Persephone would never be the same again.

From this gaping crevice in the ground emerged the awe-inspiring god of the Underworld, Hades, and before Persephone could even think to utter a word, she was whisked off her feet onto the god's golden chariot. As the crack of the whip upon his majestic horses brought her to her senses, she realized she was about to taken into the black depths from which he'd come. The thought of this brought terror to her heart, yet any screams of protest were soon lost within the darkness, as they descended quickly into the Underworld below.

This is such a famous myth that in the 17th century, a sculpture was commissioned to depict it. The Italian state purchased the work and relocated it to the Galleria Borghese. It’s called “The Rape of Persephone.”[2] The sculptor is Bernini.

The professor’s discussion of that story caused a member of the class at Columbia feel unsafe, and the professor was publicly reprimanded in the university newspaper for being insensitive. The student needed a safe place in which she could discuss her traumatization at hearing the myth.

SOPHOMORIC

Immature students publicly criticizing their college professor in print?  Offended students demanding the replacing of a classic of Western Literature?  They know what’s best? Someone feels unsafe, endures trauma, and is offended at hearing a myth?

I feel like a stranger in a strange land.

THE LANGUAGE

We fawn over celebrities that assault us with language for which we would have thrown them out of our schools, houses, and public buildings not long ago. Our sports heroes cheat, and remain our heroes; our leaders look right in the camera and lie, know they’re lying, and when caught, we sigh a, “So?” In a sports world where soccer players theatrically feign injuries, where cyclists dope, and college recruiting violations persist, what’s happened to fair play?

Talk about being a stranger in a strange land: we prosecute, fine, shame, and ruin those who refuse to deny their biblical beliefs. We kill babies and have the arrogance to call it “women’s rights,” a part of  “reproductive health care.”

We submit to being the most taxed people in recorded history; our government takes more money away from us than any government ever, and we don’t seem to mind when it spends $7,000,000 a minute, claims it needs more and comes after more.

In Fairfax County Virginia, the school board made a decision: “Those males who think or feel they are girls (a newly discovered phenomenon called, “gender fluidity”) will be allowed to use the restrooms and locker rooms of the opposite sex. If the board follows the example of Minnesota, schools would have to accommodate male transgendered students who want to spend nights at travel games in hotel rooms with female athletes.” (“The Federalist”)

I feel like I’m a stranger in a strange land where under the ozone layer is an insane asylum with the inmates in charge.

BUT WAIT . . . THERE’S MORE

It’s like Jonah Goldberg said: We’re in the movie, “Gaslight,” where a man whose wife is normal, decent, and good tries to drive her insane, and hounds her to the point where she thinks something is wrong with her, where she comes to the point that she thinks that she ought to be committed. She’s been “gaslighted.”

That’s the way it is today: If we oppose what’s evil, they make us think that there’s something wrong with us, not them.

That’s the real inversion. The real inversion is what Isaiah wrote: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!”

On May 27, 2015, Vice President Joe Biden was a spokesman for this inversion when he, advocating same-sex marriage, called it “progress,” and said, “I continue to believe that in every corner of the world, people want to do the right thing. “

No, according to the Bible, people in every corner of the world want to do the wrong thing. (Romans 1; Eph. 2:2-3) Progress? No, it’s a regression back to Sodom and Gomorrah and to the Canaanite immorality.

But according to our own vice-president, if we oppose same sex marriage, then there must be something wrong with us we’re not for “progress,” and we’re not with the rest of the world which wants to do the right thing.

We’ve been “gaslighted.”

That’s the inversion we’re seeing. In a society that’s rotting, the Bible-believing Christian is now declared the deviant!
________________________________________________________________________________________________
 Dr. Mike Halsey is the chancellor of Grace Biblical Seminary, a Bible teacher at the Hangar Bible Fellowship, the author of Truthspeak and his new book, The Gospel of Grace and Truth: A Theology of Grace from the Gospel of John," both available on Amazon.com. A copy of his book, Microbes in the Bloodstream of the Church, is also available as an E-book on Amazon.com. If you would like to a receive a copy of his weekly Bible studies and other articles of biblical teaching and application, you can do so by writing to Dr. Halsey at michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net and requesting, "The Hangar Bible Fellowship Journal."

Comments may be addressed to michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net.

If you would like to contribute to his ministry according to the principle of II Corinthians 9:7, you may do so by making your check out to Hangar Bible Fellowship and mailing it to 65 Teal Ct., Locust Grove, GA 30248. All donations are tax deductible.

Come visit the Hangar some Sunday at 10 AM at the above address. You'll be glad you did.

Other recommended grace-oriented websites are:

notbyworks.org
literaltruth.org
gracebiblicalseminary.org
duluthbible.org
clarityministries.org

Also:

Biblical Ministries, Inc.
C/O Dr. Richard Grubbs
P. O. Box 64582
Lubbock, TX 79464-4582












[1] In 2014, Cinco de Mayo (or the nearest Friday, anyway) happened to be the biggest non-winter drinking day of the year, and it's in the top five drinking holidays in America in general.
[2] In Bernini's time the word "rape" signified "kidnapping;” our English word comes from the Latin, “rapere,” which means to “snatch away,” “to carry off,” thus, the sculpture represents the kidnapping of Persephone.

Friday, May 22, 2015

THE SWEDISH SNOWBALL

Those Swedes have a language that defies pronunciation by foreigners. Names and words like Höglandssjukhuset, Sjukhus-sköterska, and the ever-famous, sju. Those words make our English word, "antidisestablishmentarianism" (a word hard to work into a normal conversation*), seem elementary.

The Swedes also have something else: tolerance and they're famous for it. Sweden loves compromise, consensus, tolerating everything, and agreement. Yes, they tolerate everything and everyone, everyone, that is, except Ellinor Grimmark.

WHAT? SHE HAS A CONVICTION?

Ellinor is a midwife, a midwife who has a conviction: she believes abortion is not an option and refuses to perform one. Because of her conviction that life begins at conception, the women's clinic where she worked (past tense) in southern Sweden refused to extend her contract. The clinic informed her that she “was no longer welcome to work with them.” In the notification, the clinic wondered, “whether a person with [pro-life] views actually can become a midwife.” What? If you won't kill a baby, you can't practice midwifery?

When Ellinor fought back by taking her case to the county court, a firestorm descended.

The Swedish Association of Health Professionals offered no support. If she was looking for help, it would be hard to find it in tolerant Sweden.
It got worse:
"Mona Sahlin, the national coordinator against violent extremism, proclaimed in February at a conference on religion and democracy that the 'one who refuses to participate in abortions is an extreme religious practitioner,' one who is simply 'on a different level from the Islamic State' — that is, a pro-life medical practitioner is like ISIS, just not as extreme." (Jacob Rudolfsson)

WAIT. WHAT? HELP AT LAST

But there was one group that offered to assist her and that organization was a hospital. "Great," you say. "Finally the little Davids of the world can get help from some source." But, wait. You'd be wrong. Their offer of "assistance" was the offer of a counselor to help her overcome her aversion to abortion. What the hospital was offering was psychological treatment and reeducation so Ellinor would fit into the Swedish consensus. In other words, "Believe like we believe, or else."

Most European countries, including Norway and Denmark, allow for conscientious objection, which would allow Grimmark to practice midwifery, but Sweden does not recognize the conscientious objector. One must conform. So much for tolerance. As it stands now, it's up to the courts to decide: will the law recognize the conscientious objector?

HOW FAR?
But if one Christian belief (pro-life) needs "psychological treatment," and "reeducation,"what other doctrines will be deemed to need such treatment as declared by the medical profession, the media, academia, and the state? Where is it going to stop?
"Oh, but that's Sweden; you know those Swedes, and besides, they're half a world away," we say.

How about this: "In 2012, Melissa Erwin and Jennie McCarthy asked Cynthia and Robert Giffords to rent their farm in Schaghticoke, New York, for their same-sex marriage. The Giffords, who are fully involved in all aspects of the wedding celebrations on their farm, refused because they believe marriage is between a man and a woman as a matter of religious conscience." In addition, their farm is also their private residence.
But they must conform to New York’s Human Right’s Law, art. 15 and pay $13,000 in fines and restitution to New York State and to the two women. (the court's decision in 2014)
"The government also ordered them to institute re-education classes for their staff." 

 Wait. What? Re-education classes? That sounds like Sweden. No, it's New York.
The Swedish snowball of enforced conformity of belief is rolling and nothing is stopping it. We know that during the Great Tribulation the anti-Christ will enforce conformity of worship--the worship of himself upon penalty of death.

Today, we're seeing the growing snowball of public, academic, government, and media acceptance of enforced conformity of belief. We see it in Sweden, in New York's Human Right's Law, art. 15, in Indiana (remember the bakers?) and in Washington state (remember the florist?). People, the media, academia, the government, and the courts, are in support of enforced conformity of belief.
What are the next beliefs deemed to be in need of psychological treatment and reeducation? Creationism? Jesus is the Son of God? Salvation by faith alone in Christ alone? The Resurrection? The Ascension?
Are you ready for your treatment? 
__________________________________________________________________________ 

*opposition to the withdrawal of state support or recognition from an established church, especially the Anglican Church in 19th-century England. I've never found occasion to work it into a sentence.
__________________________________________________________________________

Dr. Mike Halsey is the chancellor of Grace Biblical Seminary, a Bible teacher at the Hangar Bible Fellowship, the author of Truthspeak and his new book, The Gospel of Grace and Truth: A Theology of Grace from the Gospel of John," both available on Amazon.com. A copy of his book, Microbes in the Bloodstream of the Church, is also available as an E-book on Amazon.com. If you would like to a receive a copy of his weekly Bible studies and other articles of biblical teaching and application, you can do so by writing to Dr. Halsey at michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net and requesting, "The Hangar Bible Fellowship Journal."

Comments may be addressed to michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net.

If you would like to contribute to his ministry according to the principle of II Corinthians 9:7, you may do so by making your check out to Hangar Bible Fellowship and mailing it to 65 Teal Ct., Locust Grove, GA 30248. All donations are tax deductible.

Come visit the Hangar some Sunday at 10 AM at the above address. You'll be glad you did.

Other recommended grace-oriented websites are:

notbyworks.org
literaltruth.org
gracebiblicalseminary.org
duluthbible.org
clarityministries.org

Also:

Biblical Ministries, Inc.
C/O Dr. Richard Grubbs
P. O. Box 64582
Lubbock, TX 79464-4582





 

Friday, May 15, 2015

THE DAY I WENT TO A GIRLS' SOFTBALL GAME

My exposure to girls' softball began with a trip to a sporting goods store to purchase an "official- certified-with-the-proper-seal" softball bat. At the time, I thought it would be a simple thing to do, but, as so often happens, I was mistaken.

After one clerk directed me to the area of the store where I'd find the official-certified-with-the-proper-seal-bats, I began to peruse the rack with the help of another friendly clerk who explained that the bats on the far right were the most expensive, costing $250. I quickly took my hands off that side of the rack, remarking to the clerk, "$250 for a bat for an eight-year old girl?" (There was more of a verbal exclamation point at the end of my sentence than a question mark.)

MOVE TO THE LEFT

I suggested we move leftward on the bat rack, only to find that the bats on the far left were $80 and that was the ending point; I'd run out of rack. I told the amused clerk that I wasn't going to purchase a $250 bat or even an $80 bat for an 8 year old who might quit the sport tomorrow after her first practice when she learned that she might sweat in the Georgia heat.

He reached into the bats on the rack and picked out one (the same as all the other bats since it was "official" and "certified with the proper seal," and I saw that it had various price tags on it reflecting a decrease in price over time, starting at $80 and moving down to $17.00. It looked like the $80 bats, walked like the $80 bats, and talked like the $80 bats, so it was an $80 bat for $17!

I pounced. With undisguised and unashamed glee, I said, "I'll take it!"

While checking out at the register, I vented my amazement to the clerk at $250 bats for children as well as $80 bats for kids. The friendly clerk told me that her father bought a bat at the store for her high school brother which cost $550. I asked if he had a major league contract.

"No," she said. (I wondered if she, her brother, and her father knew that less than 1% of all those who play youth sports will receive a college scholarship. The odds are that $550 investment will not bear a profitable return.) I left the store congratulating myself at saving at least $63 and as much as $233, neither of which I was going to pay, matter what. At those prices my eight-year old player could use a rolled up newspaper for all I cared.

SHOCKS

But the real shocks were yet to come when I attended one of the softball games to see the $17 bat in action. The four diamonds on which the girls play are nice, very nice. They have base paths, outfield fences, a seating area for the parents to watch their young athletes play the game, and a concession stand at the ready to slake thirst and vanquish hunger.

SHOCK WAVE ONE

As all patrons enter the enclosure, a sign greets them, first thing, right off the bat (pun intended). On the large sign is a cartoon drawing of a young girl in a baseball uniform with the caption, "Yeah, I play like a girl. Wanna make something of it!" The drawing isn't just of a girl, but of an angry girl, her face creased with a snarl, her eyes angry, her forehead knotted. It may be a small thing, but is this drawing making the girls think something that 8 year-olds don't normally think? Is this sign putting an anger in their souls where there is none at age 8? The eight-year old I know doesn't know that girls throw a softball differently than boys, and even if she did, she wouldn't care. No big deal. Is the sign making her care, making her take offense, setting her up to become angry?

GEORGE ORWELL WAS AT THE OLD BALL PARK

I thought of George Orwell's statement, "Freedom is the freedom to say, '2+ 2 = 4.' If that is granted, all else follows." What he meant by that is if one has the freedom to state the obvious without fear, censure, shaming, or penalty, he has freedom, but if one doesn't have the freedom to state the obvious, he has no freedom. It's obvious that girls play baseball differently than boys--the mechanics of their throwing a ball differs, the mechanics of their stride is different. Do we have the freedom at those four diamonds to say that girls both throw a ball, swing a bat, and run like girls?

I coached a 5th and 6th boys' soccer teams and I refereed 5th and 6th grade girls' soccer games. The way girls and boys play soccer is different too. How so? The boys at the same age as the girls were more aggressive, the ball they kicked traveled faster with more force, the male goalies were more fearless, and the speed of the game was faster. But the problem is, if you notice the obvious, you can't say the obvious.

It's even gotten to the point that in some progressive circles, you can't address a classroom as, "Boys and girls," although it's as obvious as "2 + 2 = 4" that there are males and females in the room. Some school districts are demanding that the teacher address them without noting the presence of two genders.

THE SECOND SHOCK WAVE

The angry girl sign was the first surprise. The second one came when the game began, when the batter stepped into the batter's box and the fielders were (more or less) in place. The players were in their sartorial splendor, each wearing a nice clean uniform, complete with softball cleats, although speed on the bases isn't usually a factor in these games since it's illegal to steal a base and nobody was going to be thrown out running from first to second, second to third, or third to home. But the surprise wasn't in their uniforms, it was in what they wore in addition to their uniforms.

The batter wore a batting helmet, but not just a batting helmet, but one with a face guard. A batting helmet and a face guard for an 8-year old girls' softball game? Were the pitchers that fast, so fast the batters were in danger? No, not at all, because no girl pitched the ball to a single batter. The coach of the team or a father of the team pitched to his own girls. Was this slow pitch or fast pitch softball? Neither; it was "lob pitch" softball. Any one "hit" with the pitcher's lobs would suffer the same pain as being hit with a lobbed ping-pong ball. It was like watching the pitcher lob a beach ball toward home plate.

But it didn't stop there. I stared in disbelief at the fielders. They wore helmets too, but not batting helmets. They wore some type of headgear that encircled their heads and had a face guard too. (It's difficult to describe; you'd have to see it.) The catcher, who never actually caught any lobbed ball, wore a chest protector, a catcher's mask, and whatever that thing is that hangs down from the mask and guards the throat like you see in a major league game. By the time the catcher caught the ball, it was slowly rolling on the ground behind home plate, so the risk of injury was, to say it euphemistically, "minimal."

THIS PARENTAL PANIC IS ALL OVER THE PLACE

This is something we're seeing everywhere in our society. A city in Washington state removed the all teeter-totters from their public parks. Next to go were the swings, both declared dangerous. School recess no longer includes dodgeball, a really fun game where we got to take our revenge on another kid by hitting him with the ball as hard as our young arms could throw it. Mea culpa. Again, too dangerous. Also banned in some school districts are red rover, tag, and tether ball. The 8-year old I know who's playing softball has never heard, "Red Rover, Red Rover, let Joe come over."

It gets more serious: in Silver Spring, Maryland, CPS removed two children from their parents because the they allowed them to walk home from the park. They took them away, although there's no law against letting a child walk home from the park. They made up one to cover the situation: they declared the parents guilty of "unsubstantiated neglect." What in the world is that? Sounds like a law straight out of "1984."How can someone be punished because of something that's "unsubstantiated?"

What we're seeing are parents who want to control their children and their environment to the point where they're raising them in bubble wrap. It's even gotten to the extreme where some parents go to their adult children's job interviews. That should be both humiliating and embarrassing for the interviewer, the interviewee, and the parent babysitting the interview.

I wonder about those bubble wrapped 8-year old girls playing softball. So much gear does remove the "risks" of a lob-pitch softball game, but it also removes the fun because such rules condition the  girls to be fearful, timid, eventually unable to navigate their way through life because their parents keep rushing in to protect them from the bumps of life, even the bumps of a softball game. About the only risk I could see during the softball game was a mosquito bite. They probably had the proper protection for that too.

One mother admitted her paranoia effected her son as reflected in a test he took:
 
"A couple of years ago, my then five-year-old son William took a standardized test in which he was asked about everyday objects. The tester noted his unusual responses to some questions. When asked 'What do candy and ice cream have in common?' William replied, 'They both give you cavities.' For the question 'What is chewing gum?' William answered, 'A choking hazard.' "

The softball season is over, and mercifully so. (The game was boring. Is there anything worse than watching nine childish, inept strangers you know nothing about play a game you care nothing about?) At season's end, every girl got a trophy, so not even their feelings were hurt. The coach, the parents, and the trophy declared everyone a winner. In the process, the trophy, the parents, and the coach conditioned them for socialism.

Not only were their bodies bubble wrapped, but also their feelings. If only life were that way, where everyone is a winner, where everyone is an excellent softball player, where everyone comes in first place, where we can remove all bumps, cuts, and scratches. But we live in a fallen world full of "Double, double toil and trouble; / Fire burn and caldron bubble," as Shakespeare wrote. As Solomon said, we live in a world where even "a righteous man falls seven times." (Proverbs 24:16)

THE RESULTS ARE COMING IN

What effects will all this have on the adult Christian raised in bubble wrap? Will she have a confident boldness for Christ? Will they he a stand for Christ at a risk, when there's a price tag? Will their marriages suffer or be destroyed because they're incapable of "leaving and cleaving?" 

According to  Hanna Rosin, writing in The Atlantic, "The overprotective instincts of modern parents are destroying children’s independence, trapping them in a hyper-controlled bubble that they might never escape. (This behavior is not doing parents much good either; one study indicates that such mothers are more likely to be unhappy.)"

Myriam Signorini writes, "Overprotective mothers and fathers don't allow their children to suffer any frustration, and thus tend to protect them against any perceived 'threat,' trusting little in their possibilities. Beware! This approach ultimately harms the children, making them dependent,with little tolerance for frustration. Overprotective parents' children often have trouble relating to others and can be insensitive. To all parents I would say: Remember that your child will make errors. Overprotective parents generally believe that their children cannot make mistakes. Everyone makes mistakes--even more, making mistakes is how we learn and develop as individuals."

That was some day at the softball diamond. What sort of a day was it? A day like all days, filled with those events that alter and illuminate our times. 

To paraphrase Yogi Berra, "You can observe a lot by watching a girl's softball game"
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Dr. Mike Halsey is the chancellor of Grace Biblical Seminary, a Bible teacher at the Hangar Bible Fellowship, the author of Truthspeak and his new book, The Gospel of Grace and Truth: A Theology of Grace from the Gospel of John," both available on Amazon.com. A copy of his book, Microbes in the Bloodstream of the Church, is also available as an E-book on Amazon.com. If you would like to a receive a copy of his weekly Bible studies and other articles of biblical teaching and application, you can do so by writing to Dr. Halsey at michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net and requesting, "The Hangar Bible Fellowship Journal."

Comments may be addressed to michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net.

If you would like to contribute to his ministry according to the principle of II Corinthians 9:7, you may do so by making your check out to Hangar Bible Fellowship and mailing it to 65 Teal Ct., Locust Grove, GA 30248. All donations are tax deductible.

Come visit the Hangar some Sunday at 10 AM at the above address. You'll be glad you did.

Other recommended grace-oriented websites are:

notbyworks.org
literaltruth.org
gracebiblicalseminary.org
duluthbible.org
clarityministries.org

Also:

Biblical Ministries, Inc.
C/O Dr. Richard Grubbs
P. O. Box 64582
Lubbock, TX 79464-4582








Friday, May 8, 2015

THE DAY SHE FELL IN LOVE WITH THE PREACHING OF JOEL OSTEEN

Oprah Winfrey fell hopelessly in love with the preaching of Joel Osteen when she heard his sermon called, "The Power of I AM." Once she listened to that one sermon, Joel Osteen's popularity hit the stratosphere because she officially approved  him to be a part of her "Life Class" in 2013. On that booster rocket, his fame and audience increased exponentially. It's billed as, "The sermon that changed the way Oprah sees her life."

You may be thinking, "And rightly so; we need more life-changing sermons on that majestic name for God in Exodus 3, when God told Moses, "Tell them, 'I Am' has sent you." If you're thinking that, you're a hopeless optimist, because that's not what the sermon is about. No, the sermon isn't about God or Christ and Him crucified. The sermon is about you and you alone, because you and you alone are the "I Am" of the sermon. The spotlight is on you.

The homily isn't on the power of God, the I Am, in Exodus 3:14; it's about you, your mirror, and your power. The sermon comes with specific instructions: “When you wake up in the morning, don’t focus on all your flaws,” says Osteen. “instead, look in the mirror and dare to say. 'I am beautiful, I am young, I am vibrant, I am confident, I am secure.' ”

UH........WHY DO I NEED TO DO THAT?

Marlboro men might feel silly standing in front of a mirror and telling themselves one lie after another, but that's what Osteen and Oprah tell us to do, and they have their reasons. They promise that if we stand in front of our mirrors and say those words every morning, those words have power to shape how we actually are. "Tell yourself you're beautiful and you'll be beautiful," is the idea. Tell yourself you're 25 and vibrant and you'll be 25 and vibrant, even though your aching joints are telling you you're 86 and need to go back to bed. Tell yourself that your confidence is going to get you that job, promotion, and/or raise, and you'll get them.

DOES THIS RING TRUE?

This sounds strange doesn't it? One reason it sounds strange is because the psalmists tell us that in the morning, their focus is on God, not on their imaginary superpowers: (Psalm 5:3; 57:16; 88:13; and 92:2) The psalmists seek God, not beauty, youth, self-confidence, and energy. Proverbs tells us to seek godly wisdom like we were on a hunt for silver or gold. But godly wisdom doesn't come by standing in front of a mirror and saying, "I am wise. I am wise."

Another reason this sounds odd is because it trivializes God’s great desire for us bychanging His purpose into a desire that we be beautiful, young, vibrant, and confident by talking ourselves into it. But God wants to change us into the image of Christ-- mature, functioning, serving, ministering Christ-followers, filled with the Holy Spirit. His purpose for us is not that we change into energetic 20-somethings. 

The oddity continues when we realize that the I Am sermon is about the power of the great ME, as Joel and Oprah are a tag team pointing to inner, mystical superpowers that exist only in their imaginations. God's Word has the power to change us, not yours, not mine. (Jn. 17:17)

But "odd" isn't the right word. This is more serious than "odd" because this isn't the gospel of grace; it's the gospel of human will power and self-help. Just say it enough times and you'll will it so by your powerful words. And, if I might indulge in a play on words, Mr. Osteen's "good news" is everything people want to hear and 43,500 listen every Sunday morning live, in person, and in living color.

Through Oprah's magazine, Life Class, and television productions, we can add millions more to the 43,500. It's attractive and "good news" to hear that I can become beautiful, vibrant, young, confident, and secure if I can just say it enough times as I gaze at me in the bathroom mirror. How about we add singing a new hymn to the mix, "Everyday with Me is Sweeter Than the Day Before"? But I wax facetious.

HOLD ON, SPARKY

As tragic as it is that millions are listening to and believing in this stuff and nonsense, there's something else. What about deliberately taking Exodus 3:14 and the great "I Am" statement of Almighty God and turning it into a statement about ME? Is that blasphemy?  The Jews looked upon the name, "I Am," as so sacred that they wouldn't even pronounce it, but substituted another word for God when they read it. They considered that name so holy, so "other," that it would never cross their lips. What does that say about taking that ineffable name and using for yourself? Does it say, "Blasphemy?"

Blasphemy. What's that? It's assuming to yourself the rights or qualities of God and irreverent behavior toward anything held sacred.

To keep an audience coming back, buying the magazines, and purchasing the CDs, they have to top themselves each week; they have to get more and more "out there," to make more and more outlandish, albeit heretical, promises and claims. If one movie has a high-speed car chase ending with a crash, the next movie has to have a really high speed car chase and ten crashing cars in surround sound. Same principle. Like the ancient Romans watching the gladiators, their appetite for more blood shed in more spectacular ways had to be satisfied or they became bored. They must be satisfied. 

To keep the audience coming back to buy more CDs and books, each claim gets more spectacular than the Sunday before, even if it leads to blasphemy.

Joel Osteen and Oprah Winfrey have crossed the line.

Friday, May 1, 2015

CINDERELLA ALWAYS FINDS HER FELLA VII

The normal reaction to Christian movies comes with the words, "The acting's terrible." Well, maybe so; but is that the real problem, or is that problem caused by something we don't notice? To get an understanding of the "something else," let's backtrack way back to ancient history.

The authors wrote the New Testament in Koine ("koy-nay") Greek, that is, "common Greek." It was the language of the man on the street, fishermen, merchants hawking their wares, women drawing water from wells, children writing to parents, parents writing to their children, and families at the forum buying goods and services and gossiping. It was the language of the Roman Empire along with Latin. Most people were bi-lingual back then; that's why Paul could write to the Roman Christians in Rome in Koine Greek. Real writers writing to real people in a language of the earth, earthy.

A comparison would be good old Anglo-Saxon English, the speech of the longshoreman tying  stevedore knots with gnarled hands in "On the Waterfront," as compared to the language of an English professor standing in his classroom, lecturing on the cognate accusative. 

The dialogue in Christian movies is like that of the English professor--flat, stilted, delivered with perfect grammar, with no stumbling over words. Its dialogue is that of a writer, using words like "hoary" instead of "old," "animus," instead of "hate," and expressions like, "rough-hewn though he be." The problem is that nobody talks that way in real life (except academics and pastors). It doesn't come across as "real." The dialogue of the Christian movie gets close to what we hear when people recite the prayer, "Bless this food to the nourishment of our bodies and our bodies to thy service," as well as, "Forgive us wherein we have failed thee."

It's like the Christian movie is taking place in a Potemkin Village.

THE POTEMKIN VILLAGE

"For Catherine's 1783 tour of new Russian possessions in the Crimea, a man named Potemkin endeavored to show her the best face of the empire. As the story goes, pasteboard facades of pretty towns were set up at a distance on riverbanks. At stops, she'd be greeted by regiments of Amazonian snipers or fields set ablaze with exploding rockets spelling her initials; whole populations of serfs were moved around and dressed up in fanciful garb to flaunt a prosperity that didn't exist (later precipitating famine in the region). Therefore, a "Potemkin village" signifies any deceptive or false construct to deceive both those within the land and those peering in from outside." (From "Time Magazine," Aug. 6, 2010)

Here's a script (with stage instructions to the actor) from a Christian movie which takes place on a baseball diamond:

Gerald: Why, John, why do you keep running away?
John: I'm not running away. (Slurring his words.)
Gerald: There's a beer can in your hand, John. You're drinking so you'll forget how your career has consumed your life and ruined your chances with Karen.
John: That's ridiculous. (At this point, the script asks for a close-up of John who's to show "big emotion on his face")
Gerald: But John, you're not just running away from yourself . . .  you're running away from God.

Now you might be thinking, "But wait. I've heard people talk like that." You might have, but I'll bet the place you heard it was in a sermon or in church, not in a normal conversation on a baseball diamond. "Your career has consumed your life . . .," who talks that way on the ball field? How stilted is, "You're not just running away from yourself; you're running away from God"?

So, maybe it's not substandard acting; maybe it's the dialogue, a dialogue so wooden, so predictable, that even the most accomplished thespian would gag on it.

BUT THERE'S SOMETHING MORE FUNDAMENTAL

Asking presuppositional questions is like expecting a fish to ask, "Oh, my goodness, why am I breathing water?" We rarely ask them. Those involved in making and those involve in viewing Christian movies are like the fish; they don't ask the presuppositional questions, such as . . .

"Should a Christian film industry exist?" That's an important question, in the light of what we've talked about in an earlier article, where we asked, "Is film a proper venue to communicate the propositional truths of Christianity?" If the answer is "Yes," then what's the purpose? Evangelism? But we've seen that film is a poor venue for conveying the propositional truths of Christianity. That's because the gospel has to be explained. Movies are great at showing, but not explaining. A movie demands action, but a conversion is by its very nature passive. Once a movie starts explaining, especially with formal, stilted, and predictable dialogue, it gets preachy.

Or is the purpose of the Christian movie to get into the wallets of the Christian public? Not exactly a lofty motive.

Nor do we ask, "Should we copy Hollywood?" By doing so, are we not aping the world-system? That's something we're told NOT to do in Romans 12:1-2 and Colossians 3:2. The Christian movie maker and viewer want the Christian movie to walk like Hollywood, talk like Hollywood, and look like Hollywood, but, at the same time, not be like Hollywood. How do you do that?

Nor do we ask the question: "Why should we expect Christian movies to look like Hollywood’s?" Have you ever seen a Christian movie, a church production, that out-Hollywoods Hollywood?" Impossible.Yet we expect it to do so, and we're disappointed, even critical, when it doesn't.

The above question has a spin-off question: "Why should we expect the non-Christian to admire the Christian movie and give it both accolades and awards? The world-system finds the gospel offensive. It often beats, imprisons, kills, and ridicules those who bear the message; it doesn't give them awards.

Look at this review of "Fireproof" by Entertainment Weekly:

"["Fireproof" is] a low-budget evangelical movie jam-packed with heartfelt tips for men about how to save your marriage. Steps like: Order flowers for your estranged wife — and good ones, not a bargain bouquet. Make her dinner and light some candles. Accept Christ as your personal savior. And do the dishes once in a while, will you? (In no particular order.)" That reviewer would give it no awards.

LAZY BONES

The Christian movie is the dream come true for the lazy, fearful Christian who's scared to take a risk.

"If I can just tell him to go see the movie, that will do the trick," i. e., "that will convert him," we think. More often than not, the Christian who's urging another to see the movie is like a person trying to get his overweight friend on a diet--he never tells the person, "Big boy, You're fat and need to lose the stomach, so get your biscuit hooks off the pizza, fries, and donuts."

Instead, he touts the diet as "giving energy" and various health benefits. The Christian recommends the movie as something other than it really is--a tool of evangelism. He doesn't tell his co-worker that the movie is a trap; he hides the agenda, which goes unrealized until the unsuspecting have bought their tickets and are sitting in the dark. It's only then that they realize, "We've been played." (One wonders how many unsuspecting husbands were tricked into watching "Fireproof.") Of course, that's not the movie's fault (unless it advertises itself as something other than it is); it only creates the opportunity for deception by deceptive people.

THE END OF THE CINDERELLA SERIES

The impression left us by the New Testament concerning evangelism is one person dialoguing with others in the milieu of life: sitting by a well, in a conversation at night, sitting in a chariot with an open Bible, in a jail cell, in a home, by a riverbank, in a rented room, in a rented hall, or in an ancient city's forum. At times, there were also discourses to crowds, sometimes large crowds, as in Acts 2.

There were plays in those days, a popular form of entertainment inherited from the Greeks, but the New Testament never says the early Christians ever wrote, produced, or acted in one to disseminate the good news.

Paul wrote his brothers and sisters in Christ a prayer request: ". . . that God may open a door for our message, so that we may proclaim the mystery of Christ, for which I am in chains.  Pray that I may proclaim it clearly, as I should."

Whether film can "proclaim it clearly" is an neglected question. 
____________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Mike Halsey is the chancellor of Grace Biblical Seminary, a Bible teacher at the Hangar Bible Fellowship, the author of Truthspeak and his new book, The Gospel of Grace and Truth: A Theology of Grace from the Gospel of John," both available on Amazon.com. A copy of his book, Microbes in the Bloodstream of the Church, is also available as an E-book on Amazon.com. If you would like to a receive a copy of his weekly Bible studies and other articles of biblical teaching and application, you can do so by writing to Dr. Halsey at michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net and requesting, "The Hangar Bible Fellowship Journal."

Comments may be addressed to michaeldhalsey@bellsouth.net.

If you would like to contribute to his ministry according to the principle of II Corinthians 9:7, you may do so by making your check out to Hangar Bible Fellowship and mailing it to 65 Teal Ct., Locust Grove, GA 30248. All donations are tax deductible.

Come visit the Hangar some Sunday at 10 AM at the above address. You'll be glad you did.

Other recommended grace-oriented websites are:

notbyworks.org
literaltruth.org
gracebiblicalseminary.org
duluthbible.org
clarityministries.org

Also:

Biblical Ministries, Inc.
C/O Dr. Richard Grubbs
P. O. Box 64582
Lubbock, TX 79464-4582